内镜切除术治疗较大胃间质瘤的疗效评价
作者:
作者单位:

苏州市相城人民医院 消化内科,张家港市第一人民医院,苏州大学附属第一医院 消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Therapeutic effect of endoscopic resection for large gastric stromal tumors
Author:
Affiliation:

suzhou xiangchen people's hospital,,

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评价内镜切除术治疗较大胃间质瘤(长径3~5 cm)的疗效和安全性。 方法 2010年4月至2016年4月,对在苏州大学附属第一医院行内镜切除术治疗的29例(内镜组)和行腹腔镜手术治疗的26例(腹腔镜组)胃间质瘤病例纳入回顾性研究,提取2组基线资料、围手术期资料及随访资料,并行统计学分析。 结果 基线资料方面,2组仅在肿瘤分布方面差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.173,P=0.007),内镜组以胃底部病变为主(65.5%,19/29),而腹腔镜组以胃体部病变为主(61.5%,16/26)。围手术期资料方面,内镜组手术耗时更短[45(35,60)min比70(60,85)min,U=686.000,P<0.001]、术中出血量更少[15(10,15)mL比20(10,20)mL,U=513.000,P=0.017]、术后通便时间更早[12(6,24)h比20(18,24)h,U=585.500,P<0.001],但并发症发生率高[55.2%(16/29)比11.5%(3/26),χ2=11.543,P<0.001],瘤体完整取出率较低[89.7%(26/29)比100.0%(26/26),χ2=23.989,P<0.001]。术中大出血发生率、术后腹膜炎发生率、术后禁食时间、住院时间、住院总费用上2组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。内镜组随访30.0(17.5,50.0)个月,腹腔镜组随访38.5(26.0,49.8)个月,复发转移率内镜组与腹腔镜组比较差异无统计学意义[3.4%(1/29)比7.7%(2/26),χ2=0.009,P=0.922]。 结论 对于直径3~5 cm的胃间质瘤,内镜切除术与腹腔镜手术疗效相当,均为安全的治疗手段,且前者具有创伤小、手术时间短和术后胃肠道功能恢复快的优点。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic treatment for gastric stromal tumors with maximum diameter of 3 to 5 cm. Methods From April 2010 to April 2016, a retrospective analysis was performed on the data of patients with gastric stromal tumors undergoing endoscopic (29 cases) or laparoscopic (26 cases) resection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Baseline data, perioperative data and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Results There was significant difference on tumor location between the two groups (χ2=12.173, P=0.007). Tumors mainly located at gastric fundus in the endoscopic group (65.5%, 19/29), while at gastric body in the laparoscopic group (61.5%, 16/26). Compared with the laparoscopic group, patients in the endoscopic group had shorter operation time [45 (35, 60) min VS 70 (60, 85) min, U=686.000, P<0.05], lesser intraoperative blood loss [15 (10, 15) mL VS 20 (10, 20) mL, U=513.000, P=0.017], and earlier recovery time of gastrointestinal function [12 (6, 24) h VS 20 (18, 24) h, U=585.500, P<0.001]. Compared with the laparoscopic group, the patients in the endoscopic group had a higher complication rate [55.2% (16/29) VS 11.5% (3/26), χ2=11.543, P<0.001] and a lower intact tumor removal rate [89.7% (26/29) VS 100.0% (26/26), χ2=23.989, P<0.001]. The other perioperative parameters such as the incidence of intraoperative major bleeding, postoperative peritonitis, postoperative fasting time, hospitalization time and total hospitalization expenses showed no statistical different (all P>0.05). The postoperative follow-up time was 30.0 (17.5, 50.0) and 38.5 (26.0, 49.8) months in the endoscopic and laparoscopic group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two group [3.4% (1/29) VS 7.7% (2/26), χ2=0.009, P=0.922]. Conclusion Endoscopic resection may be an alternative therapeutic approach for large gastric stromal tumors with shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and earlier recovery time of gastrointestinal function.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马春涛,邹欢,李锐.内镜切除术治疗较大胃间质瘤的疗效评价[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2017,34(12):872-876.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-03
  • 最后修改日期:2017-11-23
  • 录用日期:2017-07-24
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-12-27
  • 出版日期: 2018-05-08
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司