口服橄榄油联合聚乙二醇电解质散对慢性便秘患者肠道准备效果的影响
作者:
作者单位:

第四军医大学唐都医院消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical effect of oral olive oil combined with polyethylene glycol electrolyte on bowel preparation for chronic constipation patients
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastroenterology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨口服橄榄油联合聚乙二醇电解质散(PEG)用于慢性便秘患者的结肠镜检查前肠道准备效果及安全性。方法 采用随机、单盲、前瞻性研究方法,将2017年11月至2018年5月于第四军医大学唐都医院接受结肠镜检查的180例慢性便秘患者均分成3组。C组检查前一晚8点服用1 500 mL PEG溶液,检查当日早5点再服用 1 500 mL PEG 溶液;A组检查前一晚7点半口服橄榄油60 mL和一块冰糖,后续同C组;B组检查前一晚服完PEG溶液后再口服橄榄油60 mL和一块冰糖,后续同C组。记录服药后首次排便时间,入眠前排便次数,排便总次数,各部分结肠的波士顿肠道准备评分及不良反应。计量资料3组间比较采用方差分析,发现差异后组间两两比较采用LSD-t检验;计数资料比较采用Pearson χ2检验。结果 B组有1例在检查过程中因无法继续配合而终止检查,B组和C组各有1例在检查中降结肠发现巨大肿物而被剔除,最终A组60例、B组58例、C组59例纳入数据分析,3组间在年龄、性别构成、身高、体重指数及术前便秘评分构成方面差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。服药后首次排便时间A组为(2.25±2.32)h、B组为(2.43±2.39)h、C组为(3.36±2.79)h,3组间差异有统计学意义(F=3.36,P=0.037),两两比较中A、C组间和B、C组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。入眠前排便次数A组为(3.47±2.09)次、B组为(3.24±1.76)次、C组为(2.49±1.58)次,3组间差异有统计学意义(F=4.65,P=0.011),两两比较中A、C组间和B、C组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。排便总次数A组为(7.20±2.67)次、B组为(6.81±2.31)次、C组为(5.64±2.22)次,3组间差异有统计学意义(F=6.68,P=0.002),两两比较中A、C组间和B、C组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。左侧结肠评分、中段结肠评分及总评分方面,3组间差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);右侧结肠评分A组为(2.03±0.82)分、B组为(1.95±0.87)分、C组为(1.53±0.80)分,3组间差异有统计学意义(F=6.38,P=0.002),两两比较中A、C组间和B、C组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。服药后不良反应包括恶心、呕吐、腹痛、腹胀,A组分别为7、3、0、3例,B组分别为5、3、0、6例,C组分别为4、2、1、4例,3组间在不良反应构成方面差异无统计学意义(χ2=4.35,P=0.824)。结论口服橄榄油联合PEG溶液可有效提高慢性便秘患者右侧结肠清洁度,在肠道准备过程中缩短首次排便时间,增加入眠前排便次数和排便总次数。对比检查前一晚在服用PEG溶液前还是服完后再口服橄榄油,未见对肠道准备效果及不良反应产生明显影响。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of oral olive oil combined with polyethylene glycol electrolyte (PEG) on bowel preparation before colonoscopy for chronic constipation patients. Methods A randomized, single-blind, prospective study was conducted on 180 patients with chronic constipation, who underwent colonoscopy at Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University from November 2017 to May 2018. Patients were randomly divided into three groups. Patients in group A took 60 mL olive oil and a piece of crystal sugar at 7:30 pm the day before colonoscopy, followed by 1 500 mL PEG at 8:00 pm before the test, and 1 500 mL PEG at 5:00 am the day of colonoscopy. Patients in group B took 60 mL olive oil and a piece of crystal sugar after administration of PEG at 8:00 pm the day before colonoscopy, followed by 1 500 mL PEG at 5:00 am the day of colonoscopy. The group C was given 1 500 mL PEG at 8:00 pm the day before colonoscopy, and another 1 500 mL PEG at 5:00 am the day of colonoscopy. We recorded the time of first defecation after taking medication, the number of defecation before sleep, the total number of defecation, the score of Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) of the right, middle and left colon, and the adverse reactions, and compared the data among the three groups. The measurement data was compared using the analysis of variance. After the difference was found, the LSD-t test was used to compare between the two groups. The enumeration data was compared using the Pearson χ2 test. Results One patient in the group B terminated colonoscopy due to unable to continue cooperation during the examination. Group B and C both excluded one patient because of a large mass found in the descending colon of patients. Finally, there were 60 cases in the group A, 58 in the group B, and 59 in the group C. There was no statistical difference between the three groups in the general resource (P>0.05). The time of first defecation after taking medication for the group A, B and C was (2.25±2.32) h, (2.43±2.39) h and (3.36±2.79) h respectively, with statistical difference (F=3.36, P=0.037). The time of first defecation was longer in the group C than that of the group A and B (P=0.016 and P=0.046, respectively). The number of defecation before sleep for the group A, B and C was 3.47±2.09, 3.24±1.76 and 2.49±1.58 respectively, with statistical difference (F=4.65, P=0.011). The number of defecation before sleep was lesser in the group C than that of the group A and B (P=0.004, P=0.027, respectively). The total number of defecation for the group A, B and C was 7.20±2.67, 6.81±2.31 and 5.64±2.22 respectively. The difference among the three groups was statistically significant (F=6.68, P=0.002). For the group A and B, the total number of defecation was both more than that of the group C (P=0.001, P=0.010). There were no statistical differences among the three groups in the BBPS score of the left and middle colon and the total BBPS score (all P>0.05). The BBPS score of the right colon for the group A, B and C was 2.03±0.82, 1.95±0.87 and 1.53±0.80 respectively, with statistical difference (F=6.38, P=0.002), and was lower in the group C than that of the group A and B (P=0.001, P=0.006, respectively). Adverse reactions after taking medication including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and bloating were respectively reported in 7, 3, 0 and 3 cases in the group A, 5, 3, 0 and 6 in the group B, and 4, 2, 1 and 4 in the group C, and there was no statistical difference among the three groups (χ2=4.35, P=0.824). Conclusion Administration of olive oil compared with PEG can improve the cleanness of right colon for chronic constipation patients, shorten the time of first defecation after taking medication, and increase the number of defecation before sleep and the total number of defecation during bowel preparation. Taking olive oil before or after PEG at the night before colonoscopy has no significantly effect on bowel preparation and adverse reactions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

席筱厚,张明鑫,崔丽,等.口服橄榄油联合聚乙二醇电解质散对慢性便秘患者肠道准备效果的影响[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2019,36(3):193-197.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-14
  • 最后修改日期:2019-02-23
  • 录用日期:2018-08-27
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-03-25
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司