胃壁全层缺损内镜下缝合方式的对比观察(含视频)
作者:
作者单位:

1.福建省立医院;2.福建省立医院肿瘤外科;3.福建省立医院胃肠外科;4.福建省立医院消化内镜中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of over-the-scope-clip and metal clips combined with nylon rope as endoscopic suture methods for full-thickness defect of gastric wall(with video)
Author:
Affiliation:

Fujian provincial hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的评价耙状金属夹闭合系统(OTSC)及钛夹联合尼龙绳系统(King closure)闭合胃壁全层缺损的临床疗效及安全性。方法2015年5月至2018年5月,在福建省立医院内镜中心行内镜下全层切除术治疗,出现胃壁全层缺损的75例病例纳入回顾性分析,按闭合方式分为OTSC组(n=20)和King closure组(n=55),对性别、年龄、瘤体最大直径、瘤体位置、缺损面直径、总操作时间、闭合缺损面时间、闭合成功率、住院时间、费用及术后并发症等情况行组间对比分析。结果在年龄、性别、瘤体位置、瘤子直径、缺损面直径方面,两组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),基线资料具有可比性。两组闭合成功率均为100%。住院时间方面,两组间比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.13,P=0.268)。总操作时间,King closure组为(63.24±43.22)min,OTSC组为(47.60±18.13)min(t=2.20,P=0.030);缺损面闭合时间,King closure组为(20.85±16.35)min,OTSC组为(10.95±5.20)min(t=2.65,P=0.010);住院费用,King closure组为(24 200±800)元,OTSC组为(36 200±2 350)元(t=6.21,P<0.001)。2组术后腹部立位平片均提示少量膈下游离气体,因气体量少且无明显症状表现未予干预。术后无迟发性出血、再发穿孔及感染等并发症,均顺利出院。术后6个月复查,King closure组小部分患者(15例,27%)出现钛夹或者伴尼龙绳残留,均顺利内镜取出;OTSC组大部分患者(19例,95%)吻合夹在位。两组均无一例转外科手术治疗。结论OTSC及King closure用于胃壁全层缺损治疗均安全、有效,前者具有总操作时间短、闭合时间短等优势,但缺点是费用较高。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different stitching methods, over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) and metal clips combined with nylon rope(King closure),for full-layer gastric wall defect. MethodsData of 75 cases, who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of gastric SMTs from May 2015 to May 2018 in our endoscopy center were retrospectively analyzed. According to the closure method, the patients were divided into the OTSC group (20 cases) and the King closure group (55 cases). Comparison was made in gender, age, the largest diameter of tumor, the location of tumor, defect surface diameter, total operating time, defect closure time, closure success rate, the length of hospital stays, cost and postoperative complications between the two groups. ResultsThe baseline data were comparable, and there were no significant differences in age, gender, tumor location, tumor diameter, and defect surface diameter between the two groups(all P>0.05). The success rate of closure was 100% in both groups. In terms of length of hospital stay, there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.13, P=0.268). The total operating time was 63.24±43.22 min in the King closure group versus 47.60±18.13 min in the OTSC group (t=2.20, P=0.030).The closure time of the defect surface was 20.85±16.35 min in the King closure group versus 10.95±5.20 min in the OTSC group (t=2.65, P=0.010). Hospitalization costs were 24 200±800 yuan in the King closure group versus 36 200±2 350 yuan in the OTSC group (t=6.21, P<0.001). Postoperative abdominal elevation radiographs in both groups indicated a small amount of subphrenic free gas, and no intervention was given due to the small amount of gas and no obvious symptoms. No late bleeding, recurrent perforation, infection or other complications occurred after operation, and all patients were discharged successfully. Six months after surgery, 15 patients (27%) in the King closure group developed metal clips or nylon rope residue, which were successfully removed by endoscopy. The anastomosis clamp of nighteen patients (95%) in the OTSC group were in the original position. None of the patient received open surgery. ConclusionOTSC and King closure are both safe and effective in the treatment of full-thickness defect of gastric wall. OTSC has the advantages of short total operation time and short closure time, but with high cost.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐丽霞,杨常顺,许超,等.胃壁全层缺损内镜下缝合方式的对比观察(含视频)[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2019,36(7):495-499.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-02
  • 最后修改日期:2019-05-26
  • 录用日期:2018-10-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-07-22
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司