小肠减压管联合结肠金属支架置入治疗恶性结肠梗阻的临床研究
作者:
作者单位:

1.浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院(城北院区)消化内科;2.浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院;3.浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical application of small intestinal decompression tube combined with colon metal stent in the treatment of malignant colonic obstruction
Author:
Affiliation:

The Affiliated Hangzhou First People''s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Hangzhou

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探索小肠减压管联合结肠金属支架置入治疗恶性结肠梗阻的临床价值。方法 回顾性队列研究收集2010年6月至2018年9月在浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院消化科因恶性结肠梗阻接受消化内镜治疗的患者,根据治疗方案,分为小肠减压管联合结肠金属支架置入组(联合组)和单纯结肠金属支架置入组(单纯组),比较两组在支架操作成功率、并发症发生率、后续外科手术吻合方式及并发症发生率、住院天数及治疗费用等方面的差异。结果 共纳入83例患者,其中联合组18例,单纯组65例,两组患者一般情况比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。联合组与单纯组支架置入成功率比较差异无统计学意义[100%(18/18)比 98.5%(64/65),?2=0.280,P=0.597),支架置入术后并发症发生率比较差异也无统计学意义[5.6%(1/18)比 21.9%(14/64),?2=2.432,P=0.119)。联合在有8例、单纯组有24例在我院行外科手术治疗,联合组支架置入到外科手术时间(6.75±1.28)d,短于单纯组的(9.58±5.76)d(t=3.649,P=0.000),联合组外科术后感染并发症发生率12.5%(1/8),低于单纯组的54.2%(13/24)(P=0.045)。两组手术吻合方式、住院天数、住院费用比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 内镜下金属支架置入或联合小肠减压管治疗恶性肠梗阻安全有效,且金属支架置入前使用小肠减压管可缩短接受外科手术时间,降低外科手术后感染发生率。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the clinical value of small intestinal decompression tube combined with colon metal stent in the treatment of malignant colonic obstruction. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to collect patients with malignant colonic obstruction treated by endoscopy in Department of Digestion, Hangzhou First People"s Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Zhejiang University from June 2010 to September 2018. The patients were divided into two groups according to endoscopic treatment methods. The combined group consisted of small intestinal decompression tube and colon metal stent, and the simple colon metal stent was the simple group. Success rate and complication rate of operation, anastomosis mode and complication rate of follow-up surgery, length of stay and cost of treatment. Results A total of 83 patients were enrolled, including 18 in the combined group and 65 in the simple group. There was no significant difference in the general situation between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the success rate of colon metal stent implantation between the combined group and the simple group (100% (18/18) vs 98.5% (64/65) P > 0.05). The complications of the two groups included infection, bleeding, perforation and stent implantation. There was no significant difference in shedding (5.6% (1/18) compared with 21.9% (14/64) P > 0.05); the time from metal stent implantation to surgery in the combined group was significantly shorter than that in the simple group (9.58 + 5.76 days) (P = 0.032), and the postoperative infection complications in the combined group (12.5%) were significantly lower than that in the simple group (54.2%) (P = 0.040). There were no significant differences in anastomosis, length of stay, hospitalization expenses, bleeding, perforation and death between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic metal stent placement or combined with small intestinal decompression tube is safe and effective in the treatment of malignant intestinal obstruction, and the use of small intestinal decompression tube before metal stent placement can significantly reduce the infection rate after surgery, which is worthy of promotion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周海斌,瞿伊晨,张啸,等.小肠减压管联合结肠金属支架置入治疗恶性结肠梗阻的临床研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2020,37(5):360-363.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-23
  • 最后修改日期:2020-01-01
  • 录用日期:2019-09-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-05-22
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司