胃镜不同清洗流程清洗质量和清洗时间的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.四川大学华西医院消化内镜中心;2.四川大学华西医院研究生部;3.四川大学华西医院感染管理部

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of cleaning quality and cleaning time of different cleaning procedures
Author:
Affiliation:

West China Hospital,Sichuan University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 运用三磷酸腺苷(ATP)生物荧光法比较不同清洗流程清洗胃镜的清洗质量和清洗时间。方法 选取型号(GIF-H290)、生产批次和投入使用时间均相同的60条使用后胃镜,随机分为试验组(n=30)和对照组(n=30),用不同的清洗流程进行手工清洗,试验组采用“全管路灌流2min-在全管路灌流的同时擦洗镜身-刷洗胃镜管道-漂洗”;对照组采用“擦洗镜身-刷洗胃镜管道-全管路灌流2min-漂洗”。清洗完成后再用ATP生物荧光法检测清洗后胃镜表面和胃镜管道的ATP值,并记录清洗所用时间。其中擦洗镜身、全管路灌流、管道刷洗和计时由A成员完成,漂洗和检测由B成员完成。对B成员采用盲法(因为通过观察擦洗镜身的同时是否进行全管路灌流可判断出清洗流程,进而知道分组情况,故未对A成员采用盲法)。比较两组胃镜清洗质量和清洗时间。结果 两种清洗流程清洗后胃镜表面和胃镜管道ATP值检测合格率无统计学差异(P>0.05);两种清洗流程清洗后胃镜表面和胃镜管道的ATP值无明显差异(P>0.05)。但试验组的清洗时间明显少于对照组(P<0.01)。结论 两种清洗流程均能有效、彻底地清洗胃镜。但在保证胃镜清洗质量的同时,试验组可以显著减少胃镜清洗时间、提高工作效率、节约人力成本,值得推广。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the cleaning quality and cleaning time of cleaning gastroscope with different cleaning processes by ATP bio-fluorescence method. Methods Sixty post-use gastroscopes with the same model (GIF-H290), production batch and input time were selected, and were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=30) and the control group (n=30) with sealed envelopes method. Gastroscopes in the control group were used "scraping the mirror body - brushing the gastroscope tube - full line perfusion 2min - rinsing" process, while that in the experimental group were used "full line perfusion for 2min - scrubbing at the same time in the whole line perfusion Mirror body - brushing the gastroscope tube – rinsing” process. After completion, the ATP biofluorescence method was used to detect the ATP value of the cleaned gastroscopic surface and the gastroscopic tube, and the time taken for cleaning was also recorded. Among them, the scrubbing mirror body, the whole pipeline perfusion, the pipeline brushing and timing are completed by the A member, and the rinsing and detection are completed by the B member. The blind method is adopted for the B members (because the cleaning process can be judged by observing whether the whole body is perfused while observing the mirror body, and thus the grouping situation is known, the blind method is not adopted for the A member). The quality of the gastroscope cleaning and the cleaning time were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the ATP value between the gastroscope surface and the endoscopy channel after the two cleaning procedures were cleaned (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the ATP values between the gastroscope surface and the endoscopy channel after the two cleaning procedures were cleaned (P>0.05). However, the cleaning time of the test group was significantly less than that of the control group (P<0.01). Conclusion Both cleaning procedures can effectively and thoroughly clean the gastroscope. However, while ensuring the quality of the gastroscope cleaning, the test group can significantly reduce the gastroscopy cleaning time, improve work efficiency, and save labor costs, which is worth promoting.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杜江,张琼英,袁湘蕾,等.胃镜不同清洗流程清洗质量和清洗时间的比较[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2019,36(11):846-848.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-25
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-23
  • 录用日期:2019-06-04
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-11-29
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司