全覆膜金属支架与塑料支架在不可切除的远端胆道 恶性梗阻中的应用对比研究
作者:
作者单位:

北京大学肿瘤医院内镜中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Application of fully covered self-expandable metal stents compared to plastic stents for treatment of malignant distal biliary obstruction
Author:
Affiliation:

Peking University Cancer Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的探讨经内镜逆行胆胰管造影术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,ERCP)下胆道全覆膜金属支架及塑料支架置入治疗远端胆道恶性梗阻性黄疸的有效性及安全性。方法回顾性分析并总结2012年11月—2018年12月收治的52例接受ERCP下全覆膜金属支架(WallFlex)置入和40例胆道塑料支架置入治疗不可切除的恶性梗阻性黄疸患者的操作成功率、临床成功率、通畅时间、堵塞率、再干预次数、总费用等临床资料。结果ERCP 操作成功率两组均为100.0%(92/92),金属支架组和塑料支架组临床成功率分别为94.2%(49/52)和75.0%(30/40)(χ2 =6.89,P<0.01)。两组生存时间比较,差异无统计学意义(6.5个月比7.2个月, χ2=0.25,P>0.05)。金属支架组中位通畅时间较塑料支架组明显延长(182.0 d 比 84.0 d,P<0.01)。两组胰腺炎(χ2 =0.2,P>0.05)及胆管炎发生率(χ2 =0.2,P>0.05)比较差异无统计学意义。金属支架组发生堵塞的概率要明显少于塑料支架组 [7.8%(4/51)比 25.0%(10/40), χ2 =5.25,P<0.05],在再次干预次数方面,金属支架组要明显少于塑料支架组(0.06 次比 0.38次,t=2.91,P<0.01)。塑料支架组和金属支架组在总费用上比较差异无统计学意义(42 956.1元比 44 851.5元,t=1.84,P=0.07)。结论ERCP下全覆膜金属支架置入对于不可切除的远端胆道恶性梗阻患者是一种安全、有效、经济的治疗方法,在通畅时间及再次干预次数等方面要明显优于塑料支架。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) and plastic stents (PS) placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Methods: From November, 2012 to December, 2018, a total of 92 patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction underwent ERCP with placement of FCSEMS (WallFlex; Boston Scientific) and PS for the palliation of obstructive jaundice. Data were retrospectively analyzed for the following variables: patient survival, duration of stent patency, the need for subsequent biliary intervention, and complications. Results: The technical success rate of ERCP operation was 100% in FCSEMS and PS group, The clinical success rate was statistically lower with PS group (94.2% vs 75.0%, P<0.01). The bilirubin levels of both groups were significantly decreased after ERCP (P<0.01). The survival time was similar with FCSEMS and PS group (6.5 months vs.7.2months,P>0.05). The FCSEMS group had a significantly longer patency time compared to PS group (182.0d vs. 84.0d, P<0.01). There was also no statistically significant difference in complication after ERCP. The stent occlusion rate was significantly higher in the PS group than in the FCSEMS group (7.8% vs. 25.0%,P<0.05). The mean number of reinterventions was significantly lower in the FCSEMS group than in the PS group (0.06 vs. 0.38,P< 0.01). There was no significant difference in total cost between the two groups (PS vs. FCSEMS ¥42956.1 vs. ¥44851.5, t = 1.84, P = 0.07). Conclusion: The fully covered WallFlex stent had higher patency rate compared with PS. FCSEMS was a safe, effective and inexpensive treatment for unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

袁鹏,李士杰,周宗慧,等.全覆膜金属支架与塑料支架在不可切除的远端胆道 恶性梗阻中的应用对比研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2020,37(7):503-507.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-29
  • 最后修改日期:2020-05-11
  • 录用日期:2019-06-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-07-29
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司