鼻胃镜和常规胃镜对经皮内镜胰腺坏死组织清除术的疗效比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.海军军医大学长海医院消化内科;2.海军军医大学长海医院;3.海军军医大学统计教研室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison the efficacy of transnasal gastrosope and conventional gastroscope in the treatment of infective pancreatic necrosis through percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy
Author:
Affiliation:

Changhai Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:对比鼻胃镜和常规胃镜用于经皮内镜坏死组织清除术(PEN)在治疗感染性胰腺坏死(IPN)的中的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2015年12月至2019年3月,共24例因IPN接受PEN治疗患者的临床资料,分为经常规胃镜治疗组(n=15)和经鼻胃镜治疗组(n=9)。比较两组生命体征、APACHEII评分变化、手术清创次数、手术持续时间、术前术后胰周坏死体积差值、并发症(如出血、胰瘘、感染等)、术后恢复时间、术后均日费用、预后结局等指标。结果:经常规胃镜治疗组和经鼻胃镜治疗组在年龄、性别、病因、引流管数目、PEN手术次数、术前APACHEII评分、术前胰周坏死体积、术后恢复时间、病死率上的差异无显著统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后APACHE II评分的变化曲线拟合的差异无显著的统计学意义(t=0.378,P=0.710)。经鼻胃镜治疗组在手术时间上较经常规胃镜治疗组有显著优势(119.7±47.4min vs 172.8±56.2min,P=0.018)。经鼻胃镜治疗组术后较术前胰周坏死体积有明显的减少(468.9±137.37ml vs 404.03±170.73ml,P=0.002),经常规胃镜治疗组术后较术前胰周坏死体积也有明显的减少(722.50±292.96ml vs 499.44±227.17ml,P<0.001),两组术前术后胰周坏死体积差值的差异无显著的统计学意义(223.06±212.92ml vs 64.87±54.94ml,P=0.094)。结论:PCD引流效果欠佳情况下施行“升阶梯”的PEN术可取得明显减少坏死病灶范围的疗效。鼻胃镜较常规胃镜具有更短的PEN手术持续时间,且具有进行深部脓腔清理的优势。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】Objective To compare the efficacy of transnasal gastrosope and conventional gastroscope in the treatment of infective pancreatic necrosis(IPN) through percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy(PEN). Methods The clinical data of 24 IPN patients who received PEN treatment for peripancreatic abscess from December 2015 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, which were divided into the conventional gastroscopy group (n=15) and the transnasal gastroscopy group (n=9). The clinical therapeutic indicators of the two groups such as vital signs, APACHEII score changes, surgery frequency, operation duration,difference value in preoperative and postoperative volumes, complications (such as bleeding, pancreatic fistula, infection, etc.), postoperative recovery time, postoperative average daily cost, prognosis and other indicators were compared between the two groups.Results. There was no significant difference in age, gender, etiology, number of drainage tubes, operation frequency, preoperative APACHEII score, preoperative peripancreatic necrotic volume, postoperative recovery time and mortality between the conventional gastroscopy group and the transnasal gastroscopy group (P>0.05). There was also no statistically significant difference in the variation curve fitting of APACHE II score between the two groups (t=0.378, P=0.710).The operative time of the transnasal gastroscopy group was significantly better than that of the conventional gastroscopy group (119.7±47.4min vs 172.8±56.2min, P=0.018).There was a significant decrease in peripancreatic necrotic volume in the transnasal gastroscopy group(468.9±137.37ml vs 404.03±170.73ml,P=0.002), and in the conventional gastroscopy group(722.50±292.96ml vs 499.44±227.17ml,P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative and postoperative peripancreatic necrotic volume deviation between the two groups (223.06±212.92ml vs 64.87±54.94ml,P = 0.094).Conclusion On the condition of poor drainage effect of PCD, the "up-stage approach" such as PEN can significantly reduce the range of necrotic lesions. Nasogastriscope has the advantages of shorter duration in PEN surgery and the ability to clear deep abscess cavities than conventional gastroscopy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

董元航,姜春晖(共一,姜春晖(共一,等.鼻胃镜和常规胃镜对经皮内镜胰腺坏死组织清除术的疗效比较[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2019,36(11):815-820.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-15
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-10
  • 录用日期:2019-06-20
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-11-29
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司