Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌内镜治疗支架选择分析
作者:
作者单位:

1.兰州大学第一医院普外二科;2.兰州大学第一医院普外五科;3.兰州大学第一医院特需外科;4.兰州大学第一医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

甘肃省自然科学基金项目(1606RJZA139)


Selection of endoscopic stents for type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province(1606RJZA139)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究Bismuth分型Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌内镜治疗支架的选择方法及经验。方法 回顾性分析2010年9月—2018年9月在兰州大学第一医院普外科就诊并接受经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ERCP)治疗的65例Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌患者临床资料。按照内镜引流方式不同分为3组:经内镜胆道内支架放置术(endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage,ERBD)组38例、ERBD+内镜下胆道金属支架置入 (endoscopic metal biliary endoprosthesis, EMBE)组23例、EMBE组4例;根据胆道造影方式不同分为造影剂组(n=26)、空气造影组(n=22)及无胆道造影组(n=17)。比较术后急性胆管炎发生率、总胆红素显著下降率及住院期间死亡率等指标。结果 3种引流方式相比,ERBD组、ERBD+EMBE组和EMBE组的急性胆管炎发生率分别为23.7%(9/38)、52.2%(12/23)和75.0%(3/4),差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.499,P=0.006)。3组住院期间死亡率分别为5.3%(2/38)、13.0%(3/23)和50.0%(2/4),差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.729,P=0.021);两两比较,ERBD组和EMBE组之间差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.406,P=0.004)。3种造影方式相比,造影剂组、空气造影组和无胆道造影组的急性胆管炎发生率分别为57.7%(15/26)、27.3%(6/22)和17.6%(3/17),差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.407,P=0.015);两两比较,造影剂组和无胆道造影组之间差异有统计学意义(P=0.012)。结论 对于Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌,胆道双塑料支架置入能显著降低患者术后急性胆管炎发生率及住院期间死亡率,可作为首选支架方案;术中造影剂的使用会增加术后急性胆管炎发生率,应慎用造影剂。

    Abstract:

    Objective To determine a better treatment and endoscopic stent for type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods Clinical data of 65 patients diagnosed with type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma at Department of General Surgery, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from September 2010 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different endoscopic drainage methods, the patients were divided into three groups, endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) group (n=38), ERBD + endoscopic metal biliary endoprosthesis (EMBE) group (n=23) and EMBE group (n=4). According to different contrast methods, patients were divided into the contrast media group (n=26), air contrast group (n=22) and non-contrast group (n=17). Incidence of postoperative acute cholangitis, incidence of bilirubin levels decline and in-hospital mortality were analyzed. Results The incidences of acute cholangitis in ERBD group, ERBD+EMBE group and EMBE group were 23.7% (9/38), 52.2% (12/23) and 75.0% (3/4), respectively, with significant differences (χ2=7.499, P=0.006). The in-hospital mortalities of the above three groups were 5.3% (2/38), 13.0% (3/23) and 50.0% (2/4), respectively, with significant differences (χ2=7.729, P=0.021). For pairwise comparisons, there was significant difference in in-hospital mortalities between ERBD group and EMBE group (χ2=8.406, P=0.004). The incidences of acute cholangitis were 57.7% (15/26), 27.3% (6/22) and 17.6% (3/17), respectively, in the contrast media group, the air contrast group and the non-contrast group, with significant difference (χ2=8.407, P=0.015). For pairwise comparisons, there was significant difference in acute cholangitis incidence between the contrast media group and the non-contrast group (P=0.012). Conclusion For type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma, biliary double plastic stent implantation can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative acute cholangitis and the mortality during hospitalization, which can be used as the preferred stent scheme. Additionally, intraoperative contrast agents may increase the incidence of postoperative acute cholangitis which should be used with caution.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王正峰,周文策,张辉,等.Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌内镜治疗支架选择分析[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2020,37(9):628-631.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-24
  • 最后修改日期:2020-07-29
  • 录用日期:2019-09-24
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-09-25
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司