内镜精灵结肠镜检查对结肠息肉检出率的影响
作者:
作者单位:

武汉大学人民医院消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(81672387);湖北省自然科学基金(2016CFA066)


Effect of endoscopic genie on detection rate of intestinal polypsWang Xuemei, Wu Lianlian, Yu Honggang
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672387); National Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2016CFA066)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的探讨内镜精灵在结肠镜检查中对结肠息肉检出的价值。方法选取2016年11月—2018年12月于武汉大学人民医院消化内镜中心接受电子结肠镜检查的患者资料共18 667例,按时间段分为5组: A组3 131例(2016年11月—2017年4月),B组3 703例(2017年5—9月),C组3 134例(2017年10月—2018年2月),D组4 347例(2018年3—7月),E组4 352例(2018年8—12月),进行回顾性分析。A、B、C组单纯行电子结肠镜检查,D、E组应用内镜精灵行电子结肠镜检查。对各组息肉检出率,大、小息肉检出个数进行统计分析。结果18 667例患者中5 770例患者检出息肉,共检出息肉18 797个。A、B、C 3组息肉检出率分别为21.88%(685/3 131)、26.55%(983/3 703)、22.94%(719/3 134),检出小息肉个数占比分别为87.31%(2 161/2 475)、87.70%(2 751/3 137)、84.57%(2 356/2 786),3组间比较差异均无统计学意义(χ2=3.786,P=0.151; χ2=2.177,P=0.377)。D、E组息肉检出率分别为36.16%(1 572/4 347)、41.61%(1 811/4 352),检出小息肉个数占比分别为90.67%(4 390/4 842)、88.68%(4 928/5 557),2组比较差异亦无统计学意义(χ2=2.934,P=0.087; χ2=2.416,P=0.120)。内镜精灵结肠镜检查组(D+E组)与单纯结肠镜检查组(A+B+C组)比较,息肉检出率[38.89%(3 383/8 699)比23.95%(2 387/9 968), χ2=485.668,P<0.001]、小息肉检出个数占比[89.60%(9 318/10 399)比86.54%(7 268/8 398), χ2=29.215,P<0.001]差异均有统计学意义。结论在电子结肠镜检查时应用内镜精灵,结肠息肉检出率显著提高,特别是小息肉检出率显著提高。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo explore the value of endoscopic elves in the detection of colonic polyps in colonoscopy. MethodsData of 18 667 patients, who underwent electronic colonoscopy at center of digestive endoscopy, People's Hospital of Wuhan University from November 2016 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different time period, patients were divided into five groups: group A were 3 131 cases (November 2016 to April 2017), group B 3 703 cases (May 2017 to September 2017), group C 3 134 cases (October 2017 to February 2018), group D 4 347 cases (March 2018 to July 2018), and group E 4 352 cases (August 2018 to December 2018). Simple electronic colonoscopy was performed only in group A, B and C, while endoscopic elves electronic colonoscopy was performed in group D and E. The detection rate of polyps, the number of large and small polyps were compared. ResultsA total of 18 667 patients underwent electronic colonoscopy and 5 770 patients with 18 797 polyps were found. The detection rates of polyps in group A, B and C were 21.88% (685/3 131), 26.55% (983/3 703), and 22.94% (719/3 134), respectively, and the proportions of small polyps were 87.31% (2 161/2 475), 87.70% (2 751/3 137), and 84.57% (2 356/2 786), respectively, with no significant differences (χ2=3.786, P=0.151; χ2=2.177, P=0.377). There were also no significant differences between group D and group E in the detection rate of polyps [36.16% (1 572/4 347) VS 41.61% (1 811/4 352), χ2=2.934, P=0.087], or the proportion of small polyps [90.67% (4 390/4 842) VS 88.68% (4 928/5 557), χ2=2.416, P=0.120]. Compared with the simple colonoscopy group (group A+B+C), the detection rate of polyps [38.89% (3 383/8 699) VS 23.95% (2 387/9 968), χ2=485.668, P<0.001] and the proportion of small polyps [89.60% (9 318/10 399) VS 86.54% (7 268/8 398), χ2=29.215, P<0.001] in the endoscopic elves colonoscopy group were significantly higher. ConclusionThe application of endoscopy elves in colonoscopy can increase the detection rate of colonic polyps, especially for small polyps.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王雪梅,吴练练,于红刚.内镜精灵结肠镜检查对结肠息肉检出率的影响[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2020,37(11):816-820.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-19
  • 最后修改日期:2020-10-21
  • 录用日期:2019-10-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-11-30
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司