注水黏膜切开刀推进式内镜黏膜下剥离术快速切除贲门大面积早期癌及其癌前病变的应用初探
作者:
作者单位:

1.保定市第一中心医院消化三科、内镜诊疗中心;2.保定市第一中心医院消化三科;3.保定市第一中心医院内镜诊疗中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Application of pushing endoscopic submucosal dissection in large area of early cancer and precancerous lesions of cardia
Author:
Affiliation:

Digestive department,NO Central hospital of Baoding,Hebei Baoding China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    探讨推进式内镜黏膜下剥离术(pushing endoscopic submucosal dissection,PESD)在大面积早期贲门癌及其癌前病变中的应用价值。2017年1月—2020年1月在保定市第一中心医院内镜诊疗中心确诊早期贲门癌或高级别上皮内瘤变,且病变最大径>2.0 cm的患者纳入研究。术中应用注水黏膜切开刀(黄金刀)行PESD的患者纳入PESD组(26例),与同期该医师以普通黏膜切开刀行常规ESD治疗的患者(常规ESD组,17例)进行对比,分析2组剥离时间、病变完整切除率、出血及穿孔等并发症发生率。2组病变大小比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),PESD组剥离时间为(53.7±18.2)min,常规ESD组为(91.5±26.5)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。PESD组7例(26.9%)术中出血,常规ESD组8例(47.1%)术中出血,2例(11.8%)术中穿孔,无迟发性出血及迟发性穿孔。2组出血及穿孔发生率比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。可见,大面积贲门病变应用注水黏膜切开刀行PESD与常规ESD相比可有效提高剥离速度,降低并发症发生率,使内镜手术更安全、更快捷。

    Abstract:

    To explore the application value of pushing endoscopic submucosal dissection (PESD) in treatment of large area of early cardiac cancer or precancerous lesions. Form January 2017 to January 2020, patients diagnosed as having early cardiac cancer or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia with largest lesion diameter greater than 2.0 cm at the Baoding NO.1 Central Hospital were enrolled in the study. Patients who received PESD with water-injected knife were included in the PESD group (26 cases), and compared with those who received conventional ESD with common mucosal incision (the conventional ESD group, 17 cases) at the same period. The procedure time, the complete resection rate of lesions and the incidence of complications were analyzed.There were no difference in lesion size between the two groups (P>0.05). The procedure time of PESD group was 53.7±18.2 min, which was 91.5±26.5 min in the conventional ESD group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). In the PESD group, 7 cases (26.9%) had intraoperative hemorrhage. In the conventional ESD group, 8 cases (47.1%) had intraoperative bleeding, and 2 (11.8%) had intraoperative perforation. There were significant differences in the incidence of hemorrhage and perforation between the two groups (all P<0.001).Compared with conventional ESD, PESD can effectively improve the dissection speed, reduce the incidence of complications, and make endoscopic surgery safer and faster.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

熊英,韩静,朱亚男,等.注水黏膜切开刀推进式内镜黏膜下剥离术快速切除贲门大面积早期癌及其癌前病变的应用初探[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2021,38(6):479-483.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-14
  • 最后修改日期:2021-05-16
  • 录用日期:2020-04-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-07-06
  • 出版日期: 2021-07-01
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司