智能消化内镜质控系统在结肠镜检查中的应用研究
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国医科大学第四附属医院消化内镜科;2.武汉大学人民医院消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(81672387);湖北省消化疾病微创诊治医学临床研究中心项目(2018BCC337);湖北省重大科技创新项目(2018-916-000-008)


Application of intelligent performance measurement system for gastrointestinal endoscopy to colonoscopy
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastroenterology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672387); Project of Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision (2018BCC337); Hubei Province Major Science and Technology Innovation Project (2018-916-000-008)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的评估智能消化内镜质控系统在结肠镜检查中的质量监控作用。方法根据纳入排除标准,将来自武汉大学人民医院内镜中心的9名内镜医师按随机数字法随机分配到质控组和对照组。质控前阶段(2019年4月20日—2019年5月31日)收集入组内镜医师进行的结肠镜检查资料。质控培训阶段(2019年6月1—30日)质控组内镜医师培训质控相关知识和智能消化内镜质控系统的使用说明;对照组内镜医师仅培训质控相关知识。质控后阶段(2019年7月1日—2019年8月20日)每周给质控组内镜医师反馈质控报告,而对照组内镜医师无质控报告。收集两组内镜医师结肠镜检查资料。主要终点为腺瘤检出率,次要终点为退镜时间、息肉检出率、达盲率。结果9名内镜医师中,质控组4名,对照组5名。质控前阶段和质控后阶段共纳入结肠镜检查1 471例。质控组的腺瘤检出率及息肉检出率在质控后提高[13.7%(45/329)比7.1%(24/338), χ2=55.796,P<0.001;48.9%(161/329)比40.2%(136/338),χ2=4.071,P=0.044],退镜时间较质控前增加[5.9(3.9,7.3)min比4.1(2.8,6.1)min,Z=6.965,P<0.001]。而对照组质控后阶段与质控前阶段以上指标比较差异均无统计学意义[9.3%(37/398)比9.1%(37/406), χ2=0.329,P=0.566;33.9%(135/398)比33.0%(134/496), χ2=3.616,P=0.057;3.9(2.7,6.1)min比3.6(2.6,5.8)min,Z=1.355,P=0.175]。结论智能消化内镜质控系统结合审查和反馈模式可以实现对内镜医师结肠镜检查的质控作用,并提高内镜医师的结肠镜检查质量。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the intelligent performance measurement system for colonoscopy. MethodsNine endoscopists from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were randomly assigned to the quality control group and the control group based on inclusion and exclusion criteria by the random number table. In the pre-quality-control stage (from April 20, 2019 to May 30, 2019), colonoscopic data acquired by the enrolled endoscopists were collected. In the training stage (June 1-30, 2019), the quality control group was trained on the quality control knowledge and the use of intelligent gastrointestinal endoscopy performance measurement system; but the control group was only trained on the quality control knowledge.In the post-quality-control stage (from July 1, 2019 to August 20, 2019), a weekly quality feedback was given to endoscopists of the quality control group, while the endoscopists of the control group had no quality control report.Then, the colonoscopic data acquired by enrolled endoscopists were prospectively collected during the period. The primary endpoint was adenoma detection rate. The secondary endpoints were withdrawal time, polyp detection rate and cecal intubation rate. ResultsFour endoscopists were assigned to the quality control group and five to the control group. A total of 1 471 colonoscopic procedures were analyzed. The detection rates of adenoma and polyp in the quality control group increased with feedbacks[13.7% (45/329) VS 7.1% (24/338), χ2=55.796, P<0.001; 48.9% (161/329) VS 40.2% (136/338), χ2=4.071, P=0.044], while there were no significant differences in the control group [9.3% (37/398) VS 9.1% (37/406), χ2=0.329, P=0.566; 33.9% (135/398) VS 33.0% (134/496), χ2=3.616, P=0.057]. The withdrawal time in the quality control group increased with feedbacks[5.9 (3.9,7.3) min VS 4.1 (2.8,6.1) min, Z=6.965, P<0.001], while there was no significant difference in this variable in the control group [3.9 (2.7, 6.1) min VS 3.6 (2.6, 5.8) min, Z=1.355, P=0.175]. ConclusionThe intelligent performance measurement system for gastrointestinal endoscopy with feedbacks can monitor and improve the colonoscopic quality.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

于天成,姚理文,徐铭,等.智能消化内镜质控系统在结肠镜检查中的应用研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2021,38(10):795-800.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-26
  • 最后修改日期:2021-08-21
  • 录用日期:2020-05-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-11-04
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司