国内结肠镜开展及肠镜医师认知情况调查
作者:
作者单位:

海军军医大学第一附属医院消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1313103);国家自然科学基金(81670473,81873546);上海市“曙光计划”(19SG30);海军军医大学第一附属医院“234学科攀峰计划”(2019YXK004)


Application of colonoscopy and cognition of colonoscopists in China: a national survey
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital, Navy Medical University

Fund Project:

National Key Research and Development Program (2018YFC1313103); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81670473, 81873546); "Dawn" Program of Shanghai Education Commission (19SG30); 234 Discipline Climbing Program of First Affiliated Hospital of Navy Medical University (2019YXK004)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的了解国内结肠镜开展情况和肠镜医师对相关问题的认知情况。方法2019年11月—2020年1月,采用网络调查的方式,对全国范围内各级医院的消化内科医师及肠镜医师进行问卷调查,内容包括结肠镜开展基本情况,肠道准备方案及宣教情况,结肠镜质量控制措施实施情况,以及肠镜医师对息肉切除方式及息肉切除术后随访间隔的认知情况。结果共收集到有效问卷236份,涉及全国187家医院,其中143家(76.5%)年肠镜操作量>5 000例。肠道准备方面:采取分次聚乙二醇电解质散方案的最多,为113家(60.4%);聚乙二醇电解质使用剂量为3 L的方案被采用得最多,有126家(67.4%);肠道准备宣教方式以医护口头宣教(90.9%)和书面宣教(79.7%)为主;常规使用祛泡剂的有124家(66.3%)。质量控制方面,实施全部4项措施的医院比例仅11.5%(20/174)。息肉切除方式的选择上,对于直径>1 cm的息肉,肠镜医师的选择相对统一,采用内镜黏膜切除术和热圈套的占到了98.1%(203/207);而对于直径<1 cm的息肉,选择则差异较大。肠镜医师建议的息肉切除术后随访间隔与指南相比相对更短。结论国内结肠镜开展存在一些问题:肠道准备宣教方式单一;肠镜质量控制仍需加强;息肉切除技术和切除后随访需进一步规范及统一。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo investigate the current application of colonoscopy at hospitals in China. MethodsFrom November 2019 to January 2020, an online questionnaire survey was conducted among gastroenterologists and colonoscopists in hospitals of different levels. The contents of questionnaire survey included basic information of colonoscopy at the respondent's hospital, protocols and patient education of bowel preparation, implementation of colonoscopy quality control, and colonoscopists' understanding of polypectomy techniques and post-polypectomy follow-up. ResultsA total of 236 valid questionnaires were collected, involving 187 hospitals, and 143 (76.5%) had an annual operation capacity of more than 5 000 cases. In terms of bowel preparation, split-dosed polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (PEG) was the most commonly used (60.4%, 113/187) and the most common volume of PEG was 3 L (67.4%, 126/187). Verbal (90.9%, 170/187) and written (79.7%, 149/187) instructions were given more often than other methods for patient education of bowel preparation. Antifoaming agent was routinely used in 124 (66.3%) hospitals. In terms of quality control, only 11.5% (20/174) hospitals implemented all four measures. In terms of polypectomy techniques, 98.1% (203/207) colonoscopists chose hot snare polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection for lesions of diameter>1 cm, while options varied for lesions of diameter<1 cm. The interval of follow-up after polypectomy recommended by colonoscopists was shorter than that by guidelines. ConclusionSeveral problems are found in the survey in the application of colonoscopy in China, i.e., patient education of bowel preparation is not diversified; quality control of colonoscopy still needs to be strengthened; polypectomy techniques and follow-up after polypectomy need to be further standardized.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王润东,赵胜兵,潘鹏,等.国内结肠镜开展及肠镜医师认知情况调查[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2021,38(2):115-119.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-11
  • 最后修改日期:2021-01-14
  • 录用日期:2020-11-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-02-26
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司