双蘑菇头金属支架与塑料支架治疗胰腺包裹性坏死的对比观察
作者:
作者单位:

1.浙江中医药大学第四临床医学院;2.浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

浙江省卫生健康重大科技计划(WKJ?ZJ?2136);浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2021ZH003,2021441076);杭州市科技发展计划项目(202004A14);杭州市医学高峰学科


A comparative study of lumen‑apposing metal stent and plastic stent for the treatment of pancreatic walled‑off necrosis
Author:
Affiliation:

The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang University of traditional Chinese Medicine

Fund Project:

Zhejiang Major Health Science and Technology Project (WKJ?ZJ?2136); Zhejiang Medical Health Science and Technology Plan (2021ZH003, 2021441076); Hangzhou Science and Technology Development Plan (202004A14); Hangzhou Peak Medical Discipline

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评价双蘑菇头金属支架(lumen‑apposing metal stent,LAMS)治疗胰腺包裹性坏死(walled‑off necrosis,WON)的疗效和安全性。方法 2010年12月—2020年6月间,因胰腺WON在浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院行内镜超声引导下LAMS或塑料支架(plastic stents,PS)引流的43例连续病例纳入本次回顾性队列研究,按所用支架类型分成LAMS组(n=16)和PS组(n=27),主要对比观察2组的操作成功率、临床成功率、手术时间、内镜下清创次数、支架留置时间和并发症发生率。结果 43例均成功置入支架,2组操作成功率均为100%。LAMS组临床成功率、手术时间、内镜下清创次数、支架留置时间和并发症总体发生率分别为75.0%(12/16)、26.0(19.1,39.8)min、0.5(0,2.0)次、(41.3±28.4)d和43.7%(7/16);PS组分别为37.0%(10/27)(χ2=5.795,P=0.016)、31.0(26.0,48.0)min(Z=1.221,P=0.222)、0(0,0)次(Z=2.245,P=0.025)、(176.1±99.1)d(t=5.187,P<0.001)和14.8%(4/27)(χ2=8.893,P=0.064)。结论 LAMS治疗胰腺WON安全有效,相比PS,LAMS具有更高的临床成功率,但需要更多次的内镜下干预。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) for the treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed on data of 43 consecutive patients with pancreatic WON who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage by LAMS or plastic stents (PS) in Hangzhou First People''s Hospital from December 2010 to June 2020. According to the type of stent used, the patients were divided into the LAMS group (n=16) and the PS group (n=27). The technical success rate, the clinical success rate, the operation time, the session of endoscopic necrosectomy, the stent insertion time and adverse events were compared between the two groups. Results All 43 patients were successfully stented, indicating a technical success rate of 100% in both groups. For the LAMS group, the clinical success rate, the operation time, the session of endoscopic necrosectomy, the stent insertion time and overall incidence of adverse events were 75.0% (12/16), 26.0 (19.1, 39.8) min, 0.5 (0, 2.0) times, (41.3±28.4) days, and 43.7% (7/16), respectively, whereas these indices of the PS group were 37.0% (10/27) (χ2=5.795, P=0.016), 31.0 (26.0, 48.0) min (Z=1.221, P=0.222), 0 (0, 0) times (Z=2.245, P=0.025), (176.1±99.1) days (t=5.187, P<0.001) and 14.8% (4/27) (χ2=8.893, P=0.064), respectively. Conclusion LAMS placement is safe and effective for the treatment of pancreatic WON with a higher clinical success rate compared with PS. However, it requires more endoscopic intervention.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

瞿伊晨,黄海涛,金杭斌,等.双蘑菇头金属支架与塑料支架治疗胰腺包裹性坏死的对比观察[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2022,39(8):635-640.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-06
  • 最后修改日期:2022-04-18
  • 录用日期:2021-02-22
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-04-19
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司