磁控胶囊胃镜图像清洁度评分影响因素的初步研究
作者:
作者单位:

1.北京大学第一医院;2.北京大学第一医院老年内科;3.北京大学第一医院消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中国医镜整合联盟爱胃科研基金(AHLW201803)


Influencing factors of image cleanliness scores of magnetically-controlled capsule endoscopy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Loving Stomach Scientific Research Foundation of Chinese Endoscopy Integration Alliance(AHLW201803)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨影响磁控胶囊胃镜(magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy,MCE)胃视野清洁度评分的相关因素,并探索提高清洁度的方法。方法 回顾性分析2017年10月—2020年8月间于北京大学第一医院接受MCE的患者资料。记录胃部6个区域(贲门、胃底、胃体、胃角、胃窦和幽门)的清洁度得分(1~4分),并计算这6个区域得分的总和。收集患者的临床特征(如性别、年龄、体重指数、检查指征、是否使用食管附件、是否应用质子泵抑制剂)、预处理方案[单倍剂量链霉蛋白酶方案(西甲硅油5 mL+链霉蛋白酶颗粒20 000 U+碳酸氢钠1 g)或双倍剂量链霉蛋白酶方案(西甲硅油5 mL+链霉蛋白酶颗粒40 000 U+碳酸氢钠2 g)]。根据胃视野清洁度总分,分为图像质量欠佳组(P组,胃视野清洁度总分≤18分)和图像质量良好组(G组,胃视野清洁度总分>18分)。比较2组患者临床特征、检查指征、食管附件使用率、质子泵抑制剂使用率、预处理方案等,分析与清洁度评分相关的因素。结果 符合纳入排除标准的患者238例,中位年龄61.5(54.0,76.3)岁,女性68例(28.6%);P组35例(14.7%),中位年龄67.0(56.0,83.0)岁,G组203例(85.3%),中位年龄61.0(53.0,75.0)岁。年龄、性别、体重指数、是否应用食管附件对于胃的总清洁度评分无影响(P>0.05)。有消化道疾病或症状的检查指征及质子泵抑制剂的使用更有可能出现较差的胃视野清洁度评分(OR=2.899,95%CI:1.258~6.681,P=0.012;OR=3.168,95%CI:1.261~7.959,P=0.014)。双倍剂量链霉蛋白酶预处理方案更可能避免较差的胃视野清洁度评分(OR=0.201,95%CI:0.067~0.603,P=0.004)。结论 消化道疾病或症状以及质子泵抑制剂的使用可能降低MCE胃清洁度评分,而双倍剂量链霉蛋白酶的预处理方案可改善胃清洁度评分。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the influencing factors of the image cleanliness scores of magnetically-controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) and the methods to improve cleanliness scores. Methods Data of patients undergoing MCE from October 2017 to August 2020 in Peking University First Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The cleanliness scores at six regions of the stomach (cardia, fundus, body, angularis, antrum, and pylorus) were recorded (1-4 points), and the sum of the scores from these six regions was also calculated. Clinical features [gender, age, body mass index, indication, use of esophagus cap, and medication of proton pump inhibitors(PPI)], and gastric preparation regimens (one dose of pronase: simethicone 5 mL + pronase 20 000 U + sodium bicarbonate 1 g; or two doses of pronase: simethicone 5 mL + pronase 40 000 U + sodium bicarbonate 2 g) were collected. Cleanliness scores were defined as poor (group P, total cleanliness scores≤18) and as good (group G, total cleanliness scores>18). Clinical features, indication, use of esophagus cap and PPI, and preparation regimes were compared. Factors influencing cleanliness scores were analyzed. Results A total of 238 consecutive patients with median age of 61.5 (54.0,76.3) years were recruited according to inclusion criteria, among whom 68(28.6%) were female. There were 35 patients (14.7%) in group P with median age of 67.0 (56.0,83.0) years. There were 203 patients(85.3%)in group G with median age of 61.0 (53.0,75.0) years. No significant differences were found in age, sex, body mass index or esophagus cap use(P>0.05). Indications of abdominal symptoms or digestive system diseases(OR= 2.899,95%CI:1.258-6.681,P=0.012) and PPI use (OR=3.168,95%CI:1.261-7.959,P=0.014) were more likely to yield a low cleanliness score. Gastric preparation regimen with two doses of pronase (OR=0.201,95%CI:0.067~0.603,P=0.004)was more likely to avoid a low cleanliness score. Conclusions Indications of digestive system diseases or abdominal symptoms and PPI use may decrease the cleanliness scores of MCE, while gastric preparation with double doses of pronase may improve it.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李嘉欣,李丽,孙丹,等.磁控胶囊胃镜图像清洁度评分影响因素的初步研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2021,38(8):644-649.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-29
  • 最后修改日期:2021-07-28
  • 录用日期:2021-03-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-08-30
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司