腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗长径5~10 cm中危原发性胃间质瘤的安全性和有效性比较
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院消化内科;2.南京医科大学医学院附属鼓楼医院消化内科;3.南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院普外科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopy and laparotomy for 5‑10 cm intermediate‑risk primary gastric stromal tumors
Author:
Affiliation:

Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗长径5~10 cm的中危胃间质瘤的安全性和有效性,并评估患者术后使用伊马替尼辅助治疗是否有明显益处。方法 回顾性分析2010年1月—2020年7月在南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院接受手术治疗的72例长径在5~10 cm的中危胃间质瘤患者资料。其中腹腔镜手术组28例,开腹手术组44例。比较两组患者基本资料、病理特征、围手术期结果、住院总费用。对比术后使用和不使用伊马替尼辅助治疗的生存率。结果 开腹组和腹腔镜组临床病理特征差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组术后并发症发生率为32.1%(9/28),开腹组为52.3%(23/44),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.094)。与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组总住院时间明显缩短[(12.5±3.2) d比(15.0±3.5) d,P=0.004];术后中位住院天数明显缩短(7.5 d 比 9.0 d,P=0.006);首次排气时间明显缩短(P=0.003)。中位随访时间58个月(13~129个月),期间未出现与肿瘤相关的死亡病例。开腹组有2例死亡,分别因乳腺癌和心脏病;腹腔镜组有1例死亡,死亡原因与胃间质瘤无关。72例患者中,40例术后接受伊马替尼辅助治疗,开腹组22例(50.0%),腹腔镜组18例(64.3%),两组接受伊马替尼辅助治疗的患者例数占比差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.414,P=0.234)。术后使用伊马替尼辅助治疗组总体生存率与未使用伊马替尼辅助治疗组相比差异有统计学意义 (P=0.015)。结论 与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜治疗长径在5~10 cm的中危胃间质瘤是一种安全有效的方法。实现R0切除的长径在5~10 cm的中危胃间质瘤患者术后使用伊马替尼辅助治疗未增加生存率,且未使用伊马替尼者未出现与肿瘤相关的死亡、复发及转移。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy and laparotomy for 5-10 cm intermediate-risk gastric stromal tumor, and to evaluate whether there was evident benefits of postoperative adjuvant treatment with imatinib. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 72 patients with moderate risk gastric stromal tumors (5-10 cm in diameter) who received operation in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2010 to July 2020. There were 28 cases in the laparoscopy group and 44 cases in the laparotomy group. The clinical features, pathological data, perioperative results and hospitalization costs were compared between the two groups. The survival rates of postoperative adjuvant therapy with or without imatinib were analyzed and compared. Results There was no significant difference in clinicopathological features between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidences of postoperative complications in the laparoscopy group and the laparotomy group were 32.1% (9/28) and 52.3% (23/44) respectively, showing no significant difference (P=0.094). Compared with the laparotomy group, both the hospital stay (12.5±3.2 days VS 15.0±3.5 days, P=0.004) and the median postoperative hospital stay (7.5 days VS 9.0 days, P=0.006) in the laparoscopy group were significantly shorter, and the first exhaust time was significantly shorter (P=0.003). During the median follow-up period of 58 months (13-129 months), there was no tumor-related death. Two cases died of breast cancer and heart disease in the laparotomy group, and 1 case died irrelevant to gastric stromal tumor in the laparoscopy group. Of the 72 patients, 40 received postoperative imatinib adjuvant therapy, 22 cases (50.0%) in the laparotomy group and 18 cases (64.3%) in the laparoscopy group, with no significant difference in the proportion (χ2=1.414, P=0.234). There was significant difference in the overall survival rate between the group treated with imatinib and the group without imatinib (P=0.015). Conclusion Laparoscopic resection is safe and effective for intermediate-risk gastric stromal tumor of 5-10 cm. Taking imatinib adjuvant treatment does not increase overall survival rate of patients with intermediate-risk gastric stromal tumors (5-10 cm), and there is no tumor-related death, recurrence or metastasis for those who did not accept imatinib adjuvant treatment after R0 resection.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

任喜梅,杨金萍,倪牧含,等.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗长径5~10 cm中危原发性胃间质瘤的安全性和有效性比较[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2022,39(7):552-558.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-17
  • 最后修改日期:2022-06-06
  • 录用日期:2022-01-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-06-16
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司