经口内镜下肌切开术治疗长病程贲门失弛缓症的临床研究
作者:
作者单位:

苏州大学附属第一医院消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia patients with long course of disease
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨经口内镜下肌切开术(peroral endoscopic myotomy, POEM)治疗长病程贲门失弛缓症的有效性和安全性。方法 纳入2015年1月—2022年3月苏州大学附属第一医院接受POEM治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者共159例,按其病程长度分为长病程组(病程≥10年)与非长病程组(病程<10年),比较两组基线资料、手术情况和术后复发情况,并进一步探究长病程组复发者与未复发者的组间差异。结果 长病程组患者年龄[(57.09±14.30)岁 比 (42.08±15.68)岁,t=5.569,P<0.001]、既往治疗比例[28.9%(13/45) 比 9.6%(11/114),χ2=9.319,P=0.020]及Henderson Ⅲ级食管患者比例[17.8%(8/45) 比 6.1%(7/114),χ2=7.020,P=0.030]显著高于非长病程组。长病程组患者术后复发率显著高于非长病程组[33.3%(15/45) 比 14.9%(17/114),χ2=6.811,P=0.009]。长病程组中,术后复发者年龄[(62.50±16.94)岁 比 (53.77±12.95)岁,t=-2.121,P=0.040]及既往治疗史比例[53.3%(8/15)比16.7%(5/30),χ2=6.544,P=0.016]均高于无复发者,差异有统计学意义。结论 POEM对于长病程贲门失弛缓症患者安全有效。长病程贲门失弛缓症患者中,高龄及有既往治疗史的患者更容易复发。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in achalasia of cardia (AC) patients with the long course. Methods A total of 159 AC patients who received POEM from January 2015 to March 2022 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were divided into the long course group (≥10 years) and the non-long course group (<10 years). The baseline information, POEM procedure and postoperative recurrence were compared and the differences between the recurrent patients and non-recurrent patients in the long course group were explored. Results The age (57.09±14.30 years VS 42.08±15.68 years, t=5.569, P<0.001), the rate of treatment history [28.9% (13/45) VS 9.6% (11/114), χ2=9.319, P=0.020], the proportion of Henderson grade Ⅲ esophagus [17.8% (8/45) VS 6.1% (7/114), χ2=7.020, P=0.030] in the long course group were significantly higher than those in the non-long course group. The recurrence rate in the long course group was significantly higher than that in the non-long course group [33.3% (15/45) VS 14.9% (17/114), χ2=6.811, P=0.009]. In the long course group, the age (62.50 ± 16.94 years VS 53.77 ± 12.95 years, t=-2.121, P=0.040), and the rate of treatment history [53.3% (8/15) VS 16.7% (5/30), χ2=6.544, P=0.016] in the recurrent patients were higher than those in the non-recurrent patients. Conclusion POEM is safe and effective for long-course AC patients. In patients with the long course, the aged patients with previous treatment are more likely to relapse.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙家宁,李锐.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗长病程贲门失弛缓症的临床研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2023,40(8):630-634.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-12
  • 最后修改日期:2023-08-04
  • 录用日期:2023-01-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-08-09
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司