计算机辅助检测系统提高腺瘤检出率的回顾性研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.解放军总医院第一医学中心消化内科医学部;2.慧维智能医疗科技有限公司

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(12126608);国家自然科学基金数学天元基金—琶洲实验室(黄埔)“数学与医疗健康交叉重点专项”(1212600496)


A retrospective study of computer-aided detection system for improved detection of adenomas
Author:
Affiliation:

The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (12126608); The R&D project of Pazhou Lab (Huangpu) (2023K0603)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨基于双流算法开发的新型息肉检测系统在临床中的作用。 方法 研究回顾性纳入2023年3月至6月于解放军总医院第一医学中心在计算机辅助检测(CADe)下行结肠镜检查的833例患者为实验组,以2022年3月至6月在同一操作间接受常规结肠镜检查的770例患者为对照组。主要观察指标是腺瘤检出率 (ADR) ,次要观察指标包括息肉检出率 (PDR)、平均腺瘤检出数(APC)和平均息肉检出数(PPC)。 结果 实验组的ADR显著高于对照组(29.3% vs 21.7%, P<0.001)。对于大小在5mm及以下的腺瘤和平坦型腺瘤,实验组检出显著高于对照组[(23.5% vs 16.1%, P<0.001) , (15.1%vs 7.3%, P<0.001)]。实验组的APC和PPC显著高于对照组[(0.41 vs 0.28, P= 0.01) , (0.78 vs 0.58, P<0.001)]。CADe显著提高低年资医师ADR和PDR[(29.5% vs 18.9%, ?2=15.709, P<0.001) , (47.3% vs 33.3%, ?2=21.123, P<0.001)];然而在高年资医师中,实验组与对照组ADR和PDR无明显统计学差异[(28.8% vs 26.2%, ?2=0.502, P=0.479) , (49.1% vs 45.3%, ?2=0.800, P=0.371)]。 结论 CADe可显著提高腺瘤和息肉的检出,尤其对于大小在5mm及以下和平坦型的病变检出具有明显优势。低年资医师相较于高年资医师使用CADe的获益更大。

    Abstract:

    Objective This research aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel spatial-temporal polyp detection system in clinical practice. Methods This research was a retrospective comparative study. The experimental group consisted of 833 participants who underwent CADe colonoscopy at the first Medical Center of PLAGH between March and June 2023, while 770 individuals received conventional colonoscopy from March to June 2022, in the identical operation room as the control group. The primary outcome was the adenoma detection rate (ADR), and the secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), and polyps per colonoscopy (PPC). Results The ADR was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (29.3% vs 21.7%, P<0.001). Adenomas 5mm or smaller and flat-type adenomas were detected in a significantly higher proportion of subjects in the CADe group than in the control group [(23.5% vs 16.1%, P<0.001) and (15.1%vs 7.3%, P<0.001), respectively]. The APC and PPC in the experimental group were significantly higher than in the control group[(29.5% vs 18.9%, ?2=15.709, P<0.001) and (47.3% vs 33.3%, ?2=21.123, P<0.001), respectively]. The use of CADe significantly increased both ADR and PDR in junior endoscopists [(29.5%vs18.9%, P<0.001) and (47.3%vs33.3%, P<0.001), respectively]. However, in senior endoscopists, there was no statistically significant difference in ADR and PDR between the experimental and control groups[(28.8% vs 26.2%, ?2=0.502, P=0.479) and (49.1% vs 45.3%, ?2=0.800, P=0.371), respectively]. Conclusion The use of CADe significantly increases overall polyp and adenoma detection in clinical practice, especially in the detection of diminutive and flat-type lesions. Junior endoscopists are poised to gain greater advantages from the use of the CADe system than their senior peers.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王鹏举,李隆松,张波,等.计算机辅助检测系统提高腺瘤检出率的回顾性研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,,().

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-23
  • 最后修改日期:2024-02-20
  • 录用日期:2024-02-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司