胆总管网篮取石后生理盐水冲洗与网篮联合球囊取石效果对比分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.郑州大学人民医院消化内科;2.河南省人民医院消化内科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(2022ZY1213)


Comparative analysis of the effects of mesh basket lithotripsy combined with saline irrigation and mesh basket combined with balloon lithotripsy for Choledocholithiasis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较网篮取石后生理盐水冲洗与网篮取石后联合球囊清除胆道结石的患者,旨在评价网篮取石后盐水冲洗与网篮联合球囊取石可行性。方法:回顾性分析河南省人民医院2021年5月至2023年5月因胆总管结石接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography, ERCP)治疗的患者资料共76例,其中网篮取石后行生理盐水胆道冲洗30例(简称“盐水组”),网篮合并球囊取石(简称“球囊组”)46例,使用腹部超声、内镜超声检查、CT或磁共振胰胆管造影(Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography, MRCP )测量胆总管结石(Common bile duct stones,CBDS)和胆总管(Common bile duct,CBD)的最大直径。取石结束后造影显示胆管内未见明显负影定义为取石成功,统计并分析手术成功率、手术时间(min)、手术花费(元)、术后并发症(是否合并发热、胆管炎、胰腺炎)。结果:盐水组及球囊组取石成功率均为100%,盐水组平均手术时间(23.2±10.6分钟),短于球囊组平均手术时间(29.2±10.1分钟)(P=0.004)。盐水组平均手术费用(13343.1±1370.2元),少于球囊组平均手术费用(16137.4±579.8元)(P<0.001)。两组在术后发热、胆管炎、胰腺炎发生率方面无明显统计学差异。

    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: Compare patients who underwent saline flushing after mesh basket lithotripsy with combined balloon removal of biliary stones after mesh basket lithotripsy was performed with the aim of evaluating the feasibility of saline flushing after mesh basket lithotripsy with mesh basket combined with balloon stone removal. METHODS: A total of 76 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis in Henan Provincial People""s Hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 30 cases underwent saline biliary flushing after stone extraction with mesh baskets ("saline group"), The maximum diameter of common bile duct stones (CBDS) and common bile duct (CBD) was measured by abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, CT or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). No significant negative image in the bile ducts on imaging at the end of stone extraction was defined as successful stone extraction, and the success rate of the procedure, the procedure time (min), the cost of the procedure , and the postoperative complications (whether or not it was combined with fever, cholangitis, and pancreatitis) were counted and analyzed. RESULTS: The success rate of stone extraction was 100% in both saline and balloon groups, and the mean operative time in saline group (23.2±10.6 minutes) was shorter than the mean operative time in balloon group (29.2±10.1 minutes) (P=0.004). The mean operative cost in the saline group (¥13,343.1±1370.2) was less than the mean operative cost in the balloon group (¥16,137.4±579.8) (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative fever, cholangitis, and pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: Compared with mesh basket combined with balloon extraction, saline biliary flushing after mesh basket extraction can shorten the operation time and reduce the operation cost while maintaining the operation success rate.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

米俊,李贞娟,徐闪闪,等.胆总管网篮取石后生理盐水冲洗与网篮联合球囊取石效果对比分析[J].中华消化内镜杂志,,().

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-27
  • 最后修改日期:2024-03-12
  • 录用日期:2024-03-12
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司