复发性胆总管结石患者的胆汁菌群多样性分析
作者:
作者单位:

1.空军军医大学第一附属医院消化内科;2.中国人民解放军32145部队卫生连;3.西安交通大学医学部公共卫生学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Analysis of bile bacterial diversity in patients with recurrent common bile duct stones
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital, Air Force Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较不同类型胆总管结石患者胆汁的菌群情况。方法 纳入2017年8月—2018年1月在空军军医大学第一附属医院消化内科经腹部超声、腹部CT和(或)磁共振胰胆管成像术诊断为胆总管结石,并接受经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ERCP)治疗的45例患者,根据既往病史和ERCP术中情况将患者分为无结石(non?stone, NS)组、初发胆固醇结石(primary cholesterol stone,PCS)组、初发胆色素结石(primary pigmental stone,PPS)组和复发性结石(recurrent stone,RS)组。在注射造影剂之前收集胆汁行16S rRNA测序,分析胆汁中的菌群结构及多样性。结果 非RS组为33例(包括NS组8例、PCS组8例、PPS组17例),RS组12例。RS组中憩室内乳头患者[41.67%(5/12) 比 3.03%(1/33),χ2=8.27,P=0.004]、松软结石患者[91.67% (11/12)比 36.36%(12/33),χ2=10.77 , P=0.001]及色素结石患者[100.00%(12/12) 比51.52%(17/33),χ2=7.04 , P=0.008]的比例均高于非RS组,其余基线资料差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在门、属水平,RS组与PPS组的菌群丰度相当。Alpha及Beta多样性分析显示,RS组与PPS组相比差异无统计学意义,但两者多样性均显著低于NS组、PCS组(P<0.05)。MetaStat分析显示,幽门螺杆菌种为RS组患者的胆道优势菌群,而变形菌门和大肠杆菌种为RS组和PPS组患者的胆道优势菌群。结论 RS组与PPS组的菌群丰度相当。RS组和PPS组胆汁菌群多样性明显低于PCS组和NS组。幽门螺杆菌种为RS组的胆道优势菌群。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the bile bacterial diversity in patients with different types of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Methods A total of 45 patients with CBDS diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound, abdominal CT and (or) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from August 2017 to January 2018 were divided into the non-stone (NS) group, the primary cholesterol stone (PCS) group, the primary pigment stone (PPS) group, and the recurrent stone (RS) group. 16S rRNA sequencing was used to analyze the microbile community structure and diversity in bile which was collected before contrast medium injection. Results Thirty-three patients were in the non-RS group (8 in the NS group, 8 in the PCS group, and 17 in the PPS group) and 12 were in the RS group. The proportion of patients with intra-diverticular papilla [41.67% (5/12) VS 3.03% (1/33),χ2=8.27,P=0.004], loose stones [91.67% (11/12) VS 36.36% (12/33), χ2=10.77, P=0.001] and pigmental stones [100.00% (12/12) VS 51.52% (17/33), χ2=7.04, P=0.008] were significantly higher in the RS group than those in the non-RS group. There was no significant difference in other baseline data (P>0.05). At the phylum and genus level, the bacterial abundance was similar in the RS and PPS group. Alpha and Beta diversity analysis showed that the microbial diversity was similar between the RS and PPS group, both of which were lower than those in the NS and PCS group (P<0.05). MetaStat analysis revealed that Helicobacter pylori was the dominant bacteria in the RS group, and Proteobacteria and Escherichia coli were the dominant bacteria in both RS and PPS groups. Conclusion Bacterial abundance of bile in the RS group is similar to that of the PPS group, but the diversity of biliary bacteria flora in the RS group and PPS group are significantly lower than those in the PCS group and NS group. Helicobacter pylori is the dominant biliary bacteria in the RS group.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陶芹,郑亮,罗辉,等.复发性胆总管结石患者的胆汁菌群多样性分析[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2022,39(10):827-832.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-05
  • 最后修改日期:2022-09-18
  • 录用日期:2021-10-13
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-20
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司