内镜下治疗浅表十二指肠非壶腹部腺瘤的临床疗效分析
作者:
作者单位:

1.北京大学第一医院内镜中心;2.北京大学第一医院;3.北京大学第一医院病理科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中央高水平医院临床科研项目北京大学第一医院院内交叉研究专项(2024IR01)


Clinical efficacy analysis of endoscopic resection of superficial non‑ampullary duodenal adenoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Endoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital

Fund Project:

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding Interdepartmental Research Project of Peking University First Hospital (2024IR01)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评估内镜下治疗浅表十二指肠非壶腹部腺瘤的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2013年1月至2024年1月在北京大学第一医院经内镜诊断为浅表十二指肠非壶腹部腺瘤并接受内镜治疗患者的临床资料及随访信息,评估总体整块切除率、完整切除率以及并发症、复发情况,并依据治疗方式不同分为内镜黏膜切除术(endoscopic mucosal resection, EMR)组(n=46)、内镜黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection, ESD)组(n=16)、改良ESD(ESD with snare, ESD‑S)组(n=24),比较3组患者的操作时间、整块切除率、完全切除率等。结果 本研究共纳入86例患者,内镜下十二指肠病变总体整块切除率87.2%(75/86)、完整切除率86.0%(74/86),围手术期无迟发性出血发生;2例患者出现术中穿孔,经保守治疗好转;4例患者出现迟发性穿孔,其中3例经外科手术治疗后好转,1例经保守治疗好转。随访期间,2例患者出现局部复发,经再次内镜治疗后随访未再复发。EMR组、ESD‑S组和ESD组的操作时间分别为4(1~36)min、25(5~190)min、46(5~150)min,3组操作时间差异有统计学意义(Hc=49.892,P<0.001)。EMR组、ESD‑S组和ESD组的整块切除率分别为80.4%(37/46)、91.7%(22/24)和100.0%(16/16),完全切除率分别为80.4%(37/46)、91.7%(22/24)和93.8%(15/16)。结论 内镜治疗浅表十二指肠非壶腹部腺瘤安全有效,除传统EMR和ESD外,ESD‑S也是十二指肠非壶腹部腺瘤内镜治疗的有效术式。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenoma. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data and follow-up information of patients diagnosed with superficial duodenal non-ampullary adenomas via preoperative endoscopy and treated endoscopically at Peking University First Hospital between January 2013 and January 2024. The overall en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate of the lesion, perioperative complications, and recurrence rates were evaluated. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their treatment modality: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) (n=46), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (n=16), and modified ESD (ESD with snare, ESD-S) (n=24). Comparative analyses were conducted to evaluate operative time, en bloc resection rate, and complete resection rate among the three groups. Results Among 86 patients, the overall en bloc and complete resection rates were 87.2% (75/86) and 86.0% (74/86), respectively. No case of delayed bleeding was observed during the perioperative period. Intraoperative perforation occurred in two patients, both of whom improved following conservative management. Delayed perforation was noted in four patients, and three of them were successfully managed with surgical intervention, while one case was resolved after conservative treatment. During the follow-up period, local recurrence was identified in two patients. Following re-treatment with endoscopy and continuous surveillance, no further recurrence was observed. The operative times for the EMR group, ESD-S group, and ESD group were 4 (1-36) minutes, 25 (5-190) minutes, and 46 (5-150) minutes, respectively. Significant differences were observed in operative times among the three groups (Hc=49.892, P<0.001). The en bloc resection rates for the EMR, ESD-S, and ESD groups were 80.4% (37/46), 91.7% (22/24), and 100.0% (16/16), respectively. The complete resection rates were 80.4% (37/46), 91.7% (22/24), and 93.8% (15/16) for the respective groups. Conclusion Endoscopic treatment demonstrates favorable efficacy and safety for superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenoma. In addition to traditional EMR and ESD, ESD-S is also an effective procedure for endoscopic treatment of non-ampullary duodenal adenoma.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

于航,戎龙,年卫东,等.内镜下治疗浅表十二指肠非壶腹部腺瘤的临床疗效分析[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2025,42(7):552-558.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-15
  • 最后修改日期:2025-07-02
  • 录用日期:2024-06-18
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-03
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司