基于机器人的智慧化内镜转运系统在消化内镜中心的应用效果
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东大学齐鲁医院消化内镜中心;2.山东大学齐鲁医院健康管理中心;3.山东新华医疗器械股份有限公司

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(82470695);横向课题项目资助(6010125040)


The application effects of the robotic intelligent endoscope transportation system in the digestive endoscopy center.
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Funding for General Projects from the National Natural Science Foundation of China. (82470695);Funding for Horizontal Research Projects

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 评价智能化内镜转运系统在消化内镜中心的应用价值。 方法 采用平行分组对照试验,以机器人智能化内镜转运系统为试验组(机器人组)、传统人工内镜转运为对照组(人工组),并于2024年6月1日至2024年12月31日在山东大学齐鲁医院消化内镜中心门诊区域对使用效果进行评价。对2组的响应时间、内镜转运速度、人力成本效益等进行数据统计,并引入全职当量对试验组应用效能进行量化,评估2组在洁污分离、闭环追溯、护理人员满意度等方面的表现。 结果 研究共计纳入60 206次智能化内镜转运与60 485次人工转运数据。机器人组发放响应时间(51.08±14.97)s,明显短于人工组的(54.44±13.61)s,差异有统计学意义(t=35.8,P<0.001);机器人组回收响应时间(32.52±11.26)s,明显短于人工组的(40.20±11.40)s,差异有统计学意义(t=103.93,P<0.001)。机器人组在148 d运行周期内,转运成功60 104次,失败102次,成功率达99.83%(60 104/60 206),失败率为0.17%(102/60 206),失败的主要原因为机器人无线网络断开、机器人找寻路径失败、机器人故障,月故障次数1.05次,无差错等不良事件发生。人工组在相同时间段内,转运成功60 043次,失败442次,成功率为99.26%(60 043/60 485),失败率为0.74%(442/60 485)。机器人组的内镜转运满意度评分为(4.65±0.55)分,明显高于人工组的(3.97±0.98)分,差异有统计学意义(t=96.5,P<0.001);机器人组的转运流程满意度评分为(4.71±0.59)分,明显高于人工组的(3.90±1.04)分,差异有统计学意义(t=210.3,P<0.001);机器人组的工作强度评分为(4.06±0.77)分,明显低于人工组的(4.48±0.63)分,差异有统计学意义(t=59.9,P=0.025)。经计算后得,使用机器人智慧化内镜转运系统可节省3.68个人工全职当量,每年可节省约65.70万元的护理人力成本。 结论 消化内镜中心使用机器人智能化内镜转运系统可以提高工作效率、降低护理人力成本及工作体力强度、提升工作体验感及满意度;同时,可实现全流程智能化追溯,为过程监管及结果处置提供科学的管理依据,是安全有效、值得推广应用的内镜转运方式。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective:Assess the application value of the intelligent endoscope transportation system in the digestive endoscopy center. Methods:A parallel-group controlled trial was conducted, with the robotic intelligent endoscope transport system as the experimental group and traditional manual transport as the control group. The study was carried out in the outpatient area of the Digestive Endoscopy Center at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from June 1 to December 31, 2024. Performance metrics, including system response time, endoscope transport speed, and labor cost efficiency, were statistically analyzed. Full-time equivalent (FTE) was introduced to quantify the operational efficiency of the experimental group. Additionally, the two groups were compared in terms of contamination prevention, closed-loop traceability, and nursing staff satisfaction. Results: The study included a total of 60,206 instances of intelligent endoscope transportation and 60,485 instances of manual transportation data. The response time of the robotic group was (51.08±14.97) second, significantly shorter than the (54.44±13.61) second of the manual group, with a statistically significant difference(t=35.8,P<0.001). The recovery response time of the robotic group was also (32.52±11.26) second, markedly shorter than the manual group’s (40.20±11.40) second, with a statistically significant difference(t=103.93,P<0.001) as well. During the 148-day operational period, the robotic group successfully transported 60,104 times, with 102 failures, resulting in a success rate of 99.83%(60 104/60 206), and a failure rate of 0.17%(102/60 206). The primary causes of failure were disconnection of the robot"s wireless network, failure in pathfinding, and robot malfunction, with an average of 1.05 malfunctions per month, and no adverse events occurred. During the same time period, the manual group successfully transported 60,043 cases and failed 442 times, resulting in a success rate of 99.26%(60 043/60 485)and a failure rate of 0.74%(442/60 485). The satisfaction score for the endoscopic transport by the robotic group was rated at (4.65±0.55)points, which is significantly higher than the (3.97±0.98) points of the manual group, with a statistically significant difference(t=96.5,P<0.001). Additionally, the satisfaction score for the transport process in the robotic group was also rated at (4.71±0.59) points, noticeably exceeding the manual group"s (3.90±1.04) points, with a statistically significant difference(t=210.3,P<0.001). Furthermore, the score regarding workload intensity in the robotic group was rated at (4.06±0.77) points, which is significantly lower than the manual group"s score of (4.48±0.63) points, with a statistically significant difference(t=59.9,P=0.025). Calculations indicate that utilizing the robotic intelligent endoscopic transport system can save 3.68 full-time equivalent positions, resulting in an approximate annual saving of 657,000 yuan in nursing labor costs. Conclusion The robotic intelligent endoscope transport system improves work efficiency, reduces nursing labor costs and physical workload, enhances job satisfaction, and enables full-process smart traceability, providing a scientific basis for process supervision and outcome management. It is a safe, effective, and widely applicable solution for endoscope transportation in digestive endoscopy centers.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

白建荣,王鑫,曹丽娜,等.基于机器人的智慧化内镜转运系统在消化内镜中心的应用效果[J].中华消化内镜杂志,,().

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-29
  • 最后修改日期:2025-08-11
  • 录用日期:2025-07-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-08-11
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司